(a) In this section, the following words and terms have the following meanings unless context clearly indicates otherwise.
  (1) Adverse determination regarding a preauthorization exemption--Has the same meaning as defined in §19.1730 of this title (relating to Definitions).
  (2) Issuer--Has the same meaning as defined in §19.1730 of this title.
  (3) Physician--Has the same meaning as defined by Insurance Code §843.002, concerning Definitions.
  (4) Preauthorization exemption--Has the same meaning as defined in §19.1730 of this title.
  (5) Provider--Has the same meaning as defined in Insurance Code §843.002.
(b) An independent review of an adverse determination regarding a preauthorization exemption, the independent review organization (IRO) that performs the review, and the appropriate issuer are subject to Insurance Code Chapter 4201, Subchapter N, concerning Exemption from Preauthorization Requirements for Physicians and Providers Providing Certain Health Care Services, and the associated standards and requirements in this chapter, except as otherwise specified in this section.
(c) For purposes of this section, a physician or provider should be identified using the National Provider Identifier under which a physician or provider makes preauthorization requests.
(d) Notwithstanding §12.501 of this title (relating to Requests for Independent Review), an issuer must submit a request for independent review of an adverse determination regarding a preauthorization exemption to the department on behalf of a physician or provider.
(e) If a second random sample is requested under Insurance Code §4201.656(d), concerning Independent Review of Exemption Determination, and available as provided in §19.1733(e) of this title (relating to Retrospective Reviews and Appeals of Preauthorization Exemption Rescissions), the IRO must identify, from the list of eligible claims provided by the issuer, a second random sample of at least five and no more than 20 claims. The IRO must review each claim that the issuer retrospectively reviewed and determined did not meet the applicable medical necessity criteria and, if applicable, each claim included in the second random sample identified by the IRO. Consistent with Insurance Code §4201.656(b), the IRO may request any medical records needed to evaluate the claims subject to review and must provide at least three business days for receipt of records. Based on the total number of claims in the initial random sample and, if applicable, the second random sample, the IRO must determine whether to affirm or overturn the issuer's determination that less than 90 percent of the claims met the applicable medical necessity criteria.
(f) Appeals for an adverse determination regarding a preauthorization exemption to an IRO follow the department's process for assigning IROs under §12.502 of this title (relating to Random Assignment), except that notification under §12.502(a) will only be made to the IRO, the issuer, and the physician or provider.
(g) Section 12.206 of this title (relating to Notice of Determinations Made by Independent Review Organizations) does not apply to a review by an IRO under this section. An IRO must complete its review and provide timely notice to an issuer regarding its determination, consistent with the timeframe provided under Insurance Code §4201.656(c).

Source Note: The provisions of this §12.601 adopted to be effective September 1, 2022, 47 TexReg 5117