(a) Policy and purpose. This subchapter governs the environmental review of projects funded in whole or in part by the DWSRF. Environmental review of all proposed infrastructure projects is a condition of the use of DWSRF financial assistance and is subject to annual audits by the EPA. This subchapter follows the procedures established by the EPA for implementing the National Environmental Policy Act set forth at 40 CFR Part 6. The environmental review process described in this subchapter applies to the maximum extent legally and practicably feasible. However, the environmental review process may be modified due to an emergency condition as described in §371.40(3) of this title (relating to Definitions). The environmental review is subject to public comment. The Applicant, at all times throughout the design, construction, and operation of the project, shall comply with the findings resulting from the environmental review.
(b) Timing. The environmental review process is a component of the planning phase and must be completed prior to the executive administrator's approval of the Applicant's engineering feasibility report.
(c) Types of environmental findings. At the culmination of the environmental review process described in this subchapter, the Board will issue one of the following findings:
(1) a Categorical Exclusion:
(2) a Finding of No Significant Impact:
(3) a Record of Decision based on review of the Environmental Impact Statement prepared by the Applicant's third party contractor; or
(4) a Statement of Findings:
(d) General review by the executive administrator.
(1) The executive administrator shall ensure that an inter-disciplinary, inter-agency, and public review is conducted consistent with the NEPA. The purpose of this review is to ensure that the proposed project will comply with the applicable local, state, and federal laws and regulations relating to the identification of potential environmental impacts of a proposed project and the necessary steps required to mitigate such impacts. The scope of the environmental review will depend upon the type of proposed action, the reasonable alternatives, and the type of environmental impacts.
(2) For all environmental findings that are five years old or older, and for which the proposed infrastructure project has not yet been implemented, the executive administrator must re-evaluate the proposed financial assistance application as well as the environmental conditions and public comment to determine whether to conduct a supplemental environmental review in compliance with the NEPA, or to reaffirm the original finding. If there has been substantial change in the proposed infrastructure project that is relevant to environmental concerns, or if there are significant new circumstances, changes in federal environmental cross-cutter requirements that affect the environmental finding, or information relevant to environmental concerns, the executive administrator must conduct a supplemental environmental review and complete an appropriate finding in compliance with the NEPA. The executive administrator may consider environmental findings issued by other entities.
(e) Equivalency projects. The Board will inform EPA when consultation or coordination by EPA with other federal agencies is necessary to resolve issues regarding compliance with applicable federal laws.
Source Note: The provisions of this §371.41 adopted to be effective August 4, 2010, 35 TexReg 6680; amended to be effective January 9, 2012, 36 TexReg 9336; amended to be effective July 30, 2012, 37 TexReg 5602; amended to be effective July 4, 2016, 41 TexReg 4844; amended to be effective June 10, 2020, 45 TexReg 3863